Nobel Indonesia Institute

International Conference on Emerging Economies and The UB International Consortium on Accounting

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Sylvia
dc.date.accessioned 2020-03-12T01:49:03Z
dc.date.available 2020-03-12T01:49:03Z
dc.date.issued 2014-11-23
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/192
dc.description.abstract The difference of ontology, epistemology, and methodologies used for each paradigm is important to consider when a researcher is conducting and accounting research.Finding the answer of a social phenomenon that is influenced by a complex variable cannot be done if the researcher only reveals things that appear on the surface. This article describes the use of multiple paradigms from sociological perspectives so that the reader can distinguish the results obtained in a study when they are analyzed using different paradigms. Conventional paradigm gives a result from the distance of the actor of a phenomenon. While, the non-conventional paradigm digs deeper into this phenomenon in order to obtain a more complete picture of a reality to be understood, constructed, or reconstructed. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.publisher Departemen Pendidikan Nasional Universitas Brawijaya en_US
dc.subject Multiparadigm Accounting, Sociology Perspectives, Functionalist, Interpretive, Critical, Postmodern en_US
dc.title International Conference on Emerging Economies and The UB International Consortium on Accounting en_US
dc.type Working Paper en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Browse

My Account