Abstract:
Salmawati. 2021. The Effect of Leadership Style and Workload on Performance
through Employee Work Motivation at the Bantaeng Regency Environmental
Service, supervised by Nurdin Brasit and Muhammad Hidayat.
This study aims to determine (1) the effect of leadership style on
employee work motivation (2) the effect of workload on employee motivation (3)
the effect of leadership style on employee performance (4) the effect of
workload on employee performance (5) the effect of work motivation on
employee performance. employee performance (6) the effect of leadership style
on employee performance through work motivation (7) the effect of employee
workload on employee performance through work motivation at the Bantaeng
Regency Environmental Service.
The sample was selected with a saturated sampling technique with
data collection methods using questionnaires and documentation. Data were
analyzed using descriptive analysis and path analysis with validity and
reliability tests and classical assumption tests.
The results of this study indicate that from the regression results of
Sub- Structure I, it is known that the leadership style variable (0.723) has a
positive and significant effect on work motivation and the workload variable (0.008)
has a negative but insignificant effect (0.879) on employee work
motivation. The results of the F-count value 42.832 with a significance of 0.000,
which means that simultaneously the variables of leadership style and workload
have an effect on employee work motivation. The variations in the ups and
downs of work motivation can be explained by the variable leadership style and
workload by 57.0%.
The regression results in Sub Structure II, it is known that the variable
of leadership style has a direct (0.216) significance level with a significance
level of 0.015 (significant) or indirect (0.485) and dominant (the calculated z
value (5.83) is greater than the absolute z value (1.96). ) on employee
performance and workload variables have a direct effect (0.090) with a
significance level of 0.018 (significant) and indirect (0.005) but not dominant
(calculated z value (0.6079) is smaller than the absolute z value (1.96)) on
employee performance and work motivation variables (0.671) have a direct
effect on employee performance.The F-count value is 74,701 which is at a
significance level of 0.000 (significant) which indicates that simultaneously
there is a significant and real influence on the variable leadership style,
workload and motivation. work on employee performance The variations in the
ups and downs of employee performance can be explained by the leadership
style and workload through work motivation at the Environmental Service The
life of Bantaeng Regency is 77.70%.